|
For
the Sake of Christ's Commission
The
Report of the Church
Growth Study Committee
Photocopy
ready version (PDF format)
Preface
God
gave us Jesus Christ and His bride, the Holy Christian Church. "For God
was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself and has given us the ministry
of reconciliation" (2 Cor. 5:19). That was Good News. That is Good
News for His church now. The risen Lord is still in the midst of His church
to give her forgiveness of sins, life and salvation by means of His Gospel preached
and His Sacraments administered.
The Gospel and the Sacraments of Christ are the saving treasures of the church.
Faithfulness to this Gospel, by which alone the church lives, must remain the
central concern of Christ's church on earth. The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod
has been blessed by the use of these treasures. The enemy of God and of mankind,
however, has never allowed this Gospel to remain unopposed.
In a previous generation, the unity of the Missouri Synod was shaken by controversy
over the divine authority of Holy Scripture (formal principle). By the grace
of God, the Synod emerged from that struggle with a clearer confession of the
inspiration and authority of the Bible.
In this generation, the unity of the Synod is threatened by diversity of doctrine
and practice originating from influences that have their sources in Evangelicalism
and the Church Growth Movement. Here the content of the Gospel itself is at
stake (material principle). Therefore, we address below numerous theological
and cultural issues vis--vis the Church Growth Movement in the hope that
the Synod's mission and evangelism ministries may ever be faithful to Biblical
and confessional teaching.
While earlier studies[1]
on this
topic have been presented to the Synod, this study is in response to the request
of the 1995 Synodical Convention (Res. 3-09, see p. 35). In order to complete
our assigned task, this committee divided itself into two groups, one concentrating
on theology and the other on the culture. Our report reflects this division
of labor. This document seeks to define "Church Growth" in the words
of the leaders of the movement itself. It also aims to address some of the effects
of American Evangelicalism and the Church Growth Movement on the public confession
and worship life of the LCMS that have emerged in the past decade.
Faithfulness to the Great Commission shapes the continuing mission of Christ's
church until He comes again: "Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching
them to observe all that I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always,
to the very end of the age" (Matthew 28:19-20).
This report is offered to further the cause of Christ-centered church growth
and genuine evangelism. The principles it sets forth should serve to sort out
helpful strategies from those that, however unintentionally, obscure the life-changing
Gospel of Jesus Christ.
What
Is the Church Growth Movement?
The
growth of the church is by no means synonymous with the "Church Growth
Movement," anymore than, for example, "education" is the same
as the "National Education Association." The Church Growth Movement
may not be defined simply as any plan or suggestion to promote the growth of
the church. Rather, it is a particular historical development, marked by particular
dates, leaders, books and characteristics. It can be correctly understood and
defined, therefore, only on the basis of its own recognized standards and texts.
The book Church Growth: State of the Art defines Church Growth in the
following way:
The
science that investigates the nature, function and health of Christian churches
as they relate specifically to the effective implementation of God's Commission
to "make disciples of all the nations" (Matt. 28:19). Church growth
is simultaneously a theological conviction and an applied science, striving
to combine the eternal principles of God's Word with the best insights of contemporary
social and behavioral sciences, employing as its initial frame of reference
the foundational work done by Donald McGavran and his colleagues.[2]
In
his book, Foundations for Church Growth, Kent Hunter reflects this common
definition:
Church
growth can be formally defined as that science which investigates the nature,
function and health of Christian churches, as they relate to the effective implementation
of the Great Commission to ". . . make disciples of all nations."
(Matt. 28:19) Church growth is simultaneously a theological conviction and an
applied science, striving to combine the eternal principles of God's Word with
the best insights of contemporary social and behavioral sciences.[3]
Adds Hunter: "Church growth is a process which, like yeast in dough, slowly
but surely revolutionizes and reforms every segment of the church." [4]
According to Christianity Today, the movement's "basic book"
is Donald McGavran's 1970 Understanding Church Growth .[5]
McGavran, who was a long-term Disciples of Christ missionary in India, tried
to reassert the primacy of evangelism in an ecumenical setting that had largely
forgotten it. The 1990 version of his book was revised and edited by C. Peter
Wagner, McGavran's successor as leader of the movement.[6]
The Christianity Today article cites Wagner's conclusion: "I don't
think there's anything intrinsically wrong with the church-growth principles
we've developed, or the evangelistic techniques we're using. Yet somehow they
don't seem to work."[7]
He sees "Third Wave" neo-Pentecostalism as the solution. Elsewhere
Wagner had paid tribute to Robert Schuller, who in turn is indebted to Norman
Vincent Peale. Wagner states:
Possibility
thinking boils down basically to a synonym of what the Bible calls "faith."
Schuller's definition of possibility thinking is "the maximum utilization
of the God-given powers of imagination exercised in dreaming up possible ways
by which a desired objective can be attained." He is convinced that "the
greatest power in the world is the power of positive thinking." [8]
In
his foreword to Carl F. George's Prepare Your Church for the Future (1992),
C. Peter Wagner hails the volume as "the most significant step forward
in church-growth theory and practice since 1970." The book advocates the
"meta-church" concept, which "highlights the lay-led small group
as the essential growth center," so that "everything else is to be
considered secondary to its promotion and preservation."[9]
This book and other Church Growth literature and materials have exerted enormous
influence on the official and unofficial mission and evangelism thinking of
the Missouri Synod and its districts. See also Kent Hunter's recent defense
of the Movement in his Confession of a Church Growth Enthusiast (1997)[10]
and the numerous endorsements by LCMS leaders contained in the book.
Some emphases of the Church Growth Movement have highlighted the importance
of mission work and a desire for healthy growth. There is certainly nothing
wrong with common sense suggestions that might make a church more accessible
and relational--the need for visibility, adequate parking space and facilities,
ways of making a congregation more welcoming to new members, and the like. Such
ideas are helpful. The problems with the Church Growth Movement have to do with
the assumption that God's Word is not sufficient, that it needs to be supplemented
with "contemporary social and behavioral sciences." In practice, this
means changing the church--its worship, its self-understanding, and its confession--so
that it conforms to contemporary American culture. Marketing techniques turn
sinners in need of salvation into consumers. The church adapts its practices
to attract consumers and seeks thereby to grow in numbers. Institutes and mega-church
workshops and church-growth materials are potential sources of introducing alien
doctrines into the life and mission of the Synod. Tragically, the Gospel itself
is sometimes compromised, redefined, or treated as secondary.
The goal of many Church Growth proponents, to win souls for Christ through the
Gospel, is a worthy one. Ironically, many of the Church Growth techniques work
instead to undermine the Gospel. Church Growth principles have roots in American
revivalism, which suggests that people have within them the free will to "make
a decision for Jesus." This implies that gaining new Christians is a human
work--a matter of rhetorical and emotional manipulation, applying the correct
techniques, and following the right principles--rather than the work of God.
Typical Church Growth techniques minimize the Means of Grace, which are God's
way of conveying the salvation of Christ, and instead confuse Law and Gospel,
mingle the Two Kingdoms, and promote a theology of glory over the theology of
the cross. Such things, however sincerely done, undermine the very Gospel they
are intended to proclaim.
Part
One: The
Theological Issues
The
following statements spell out Biblical principles for genuine evangelism, in
which God Himself grows His church by bringing sinners to faith. Therefore,
they are a means of assessing the theology and the various practices advocated
by the Church Growth Movement.
I.
The saving presence of God the Holy Trinity
through the means of grace (Word and Sacrament) is the
heart and center of the church's life, worship and growth.
The Word of the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the power of God for salvation (John
6:63; Rom. 1:16).
Holy Absolution, as an application of that Gospel, actually bestows forgiveness
of sins in Jesus' name (John 20:21-22; Ap. XII).
The Sacrament of Holy Baptism is the washing of regeneration and renewal in
the Holy Spirit (Titus 3:5, Matt. 28:19-20).
The Sacrament of the Altar is the actual body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ,
under the bread and the wine, given to us Christians to eat and to drink for
forgiveness of sins, life and salvation (1 Cor. 10:16, Luke 22:14-20).
The Gospel and the Sacraments are the distinguishing marks of Christ's church
on earth and the means by which God the Holy Trinity grants His forgiving and
life-giving presence among His people (SC; AC V & VII; Ap. VII & VIII.7;
XIV.4; SA III, viii.10).
Our churches confess a clear theology of worship embracing sermon, Sacrament,
and prayer. This is not a matter of adiaphora (ACXXIV, Ap. XXIV, XV.42-43).
All rites and ceremonies that serve the Gospel purely preached and the Sacraments
rightly administered are observed for the sake of faithfulness to the Gospel,
and for unity and continuity in the faith (AC XXIV, XXVI.40-42; Ap. XV.20; FC
SD X.5).
All liturgies, hymns, and agendas used in the churches of our confession are
to be doctrinally pure and in accord with the faith of the one, holy, Christian
and apostolic church (FC SD RN.10).
It
follows that spiritual growth does not happen entirely or
in part through man-made devices and methodologies.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When
absolution and the Sacraments of Holy Baptism and Holy Communion are minimized
in favor of personal religious efforts, relational concerns or church activities.
When
people-oriented social sciences and methodologies subtly dominate the God-centered
Means of Grace.
When
small-group (meta-church) organization and interaction are considered essential
or compete without the public ministry of God's Word and Sacrament.
When
"spiritual gifts" are substituted for the Means of Grace as the organizing
principle of the church.
When
every-busy church activism is substituted for God-pleasing service in daily
Christian vocation.
When
programs of "leadership training" result in (1) substitution of lay
leaders for public ministers of the Gospel or (2) inadequate training for the
proper theological preparation of preachers.
II.
The mission of the church is God's mission.
In the Divine Service, the corporate worship of the church, the risen Christ
publicly nurtures and feeds His people by means of the Word and the Sacraments.
All Christian witness in home, church and society flows from and leads to this
corporate worship (1 Cor. 10:17, 11:26; Heb. 10:23-25; Acts 2:42).
The gifts of the Gospel, forgiveness and life given in Word and Sacrament--are
God's own means for evangelizing the lost. (See section III.) This is how Christ
builds His church (Matt. 16:18; Eph. 2:20-22; Col. 2:19).
God created all people--regardless of sex, race, generation, or culture--but
all have sinned and are equally in need of salvation. God desires all to receive
in faith the redemption already won for all through His Son, Jesus Christ, and
delivered in His Word and Holy Sacraments.
The Holy Spirit through the Holy Scriptures has given us one Gospel for all
people in whatever culture they live (Acts 4:12; Gal. 1:6-9).
God has given the church a unique and different message, which the sinful world
cannot understand or appreciate (1 Cor. 1 & 2, esp. 2:14). This message
must be treasured and proclaimed so that the Holy Spirit can change the hearts
of people.
God has called the community of faith in every place to welcome visitors and
inquirers warmly and openly. He calls His church lovingly to adapt her outreach
to the culture of the hearers without giving up any of the doctrinal and sacramental
fullness of the Gospel (Lev. 19:34; Matt. 25:35; 1 Cor. 9:22; Heb. 13:2).
It
follows that the church's mission is to be viewed
theologically rather than sociologically.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When an artificial tension is postulated between the church's worship and the
church's mission.
When mission is shaped mainly by its attractiveness and friendliness to unbelievers,
thus pandering to the old Adam.
When secular culture in one way or another controls the shape of the church's
mission.
When multi-cultural emphases override the one transcultural mission of the church
to all people, thus promoting a different Gospel for each subculture.
When the decisive criteria for the church's mission become techniques of commercial
marketing, rhetorical persuasion, statistical success, or external appearances
of happiness or harmony.
When recently popularized small groups (meta groups) are viewed as foundational
in mission. [Foundational gatherings, or the "house churches" referenced
in Acts 2:42-46 were apostle-led gatherings of Word and Sacrament ministry.]
III.
Pastors are shepherds of Christ's sheep called
to feed them with His Word and Sacraments and
thus to lead them in the mission of the church.
Jesus Christ gave His church the preaching office precisely for the missionary
proclamation of the Gospel (Rom. 10:14,15; 2 Cor. 3:6; 4:5; 5:20; AC V &
XIV).
God has given pastors to His church to feed His flock and defend it against
error. This includes both teaching the pure doctrine, and overseeing the doctrine
and life of the community of faith (John 21:15-17; 1 Tim. 3:1; 4:13 & 16;
Titus 1:5 & 9; 2:1; Heb. 13:7 & 17; AC XXVIII).
The ordination and installation rites of our church specify the real responsibilities
of the pastor and the promises of God concerning the Holy Ministry.
Since Christ builds His church through the Gospel, the preaching of that Gospel
is the highest office or activity in the church and the chief instrument of
its mission (Acts 6: 1-7, Rom 1:16; 10:14-17). "Practical and clear sermons
hold an audience. The real adornment of the churches is godly, practical, and
clear teaching, the godly use of the Sacraments, ardent prayer, and the like"
(Ap. XXIV.50-51).
In addition to public preaching of the Word, administration of the Sacraments,
and confession and absolution, a pastor's own responsibilities include teaching,
comforting the sick and dying, admonishing the erring, evangelizing the lost,
counseling the inquirer, reconciling the alienated, etc. (Luke 15; 1 Tim. 4:16;
2 Tim. 4:5).
God's
people are a glorious priesthood (priesthood
of all believers), which is far greater than and
different from the new idea of "everyone a minister." The public Gospel
ministry, in turn, serves this priesthood of all God's people.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When the modern concept "everyone a minister" is equated with the
priesthood of all believers: a) This denies the true priesthood of all believers,
which is exercised not only in worship and prayer, but also in daily vocation
(i.e., the work of one's earthly calling, Christian witness in daily life, parental
teaching in the home, etc.) (1 Pet. 2:9; Rom. 12:1-2); b) It confuses individual
Christian lives with public offices in the church. (Acts 6); c) It can be used
to undermine Jesus' gift of the office of preaching the Word and administering
the Sacraments (pastoral office) (Eph. 3:7-10, 4:11; 1 Cor. 12:28-29 (AC V,
XIV, XXVIII [8]).
When congregations or small groups are encouraged to regard fellow lay Christians
or church staff personnel as their pastors rather than those men properly trained,
qualified, called and ordained to the pastoral office.
When the pastor is viewed as a chief executive officer, administrator, or director
whose primary purpose is to train laity to do the real pastoral care.
When it is held that some ethnic groups or small congregations do not need properly
educated, called and ordained ministers of the Gospel.
When pastors lord it over their flocks, not giving patient attention to careful
instruction and faithful service as Christ's undershepherds to His sheep.
IV.
Worship is the center of the
church's
life both in this world and in the next.
Christ's
church is the assembly of saints gathered around His Gospel and Sacraments (Eph.
2:20; 4:5,6; Heb. 12:18-24; AC VII).
Though ceremonies and rites for such gatherings are not dictated, Christ's holy
presence and His promised gifts determine both the substance and the reverent
style of the Divine Service.
Christian freedom with respect to rites and ceremonies is defined and determined
by Scripture and Confessions. In part, our churches retain ancient worship forms
for the purpose of teaching, order and continuity with the worshipping church
universal as our joyful confession of the presence and life-giving treasures
of Christ (Ap. VII and VIII, 33; XV, 38-39; 44; 51; FC X ).
Because church fellowship rests on true confession (agreement in the apostolic
doctrine), not on an assumed "faith in the heart," loving pastoral
care in public worship leads a congregation in the practice of close(d) communion
(Acts 2:42; 1 Cor. 11:27-30).
Worship is first of all God's service to us--His giving forgiveness, life and
salvation in Christ; only upon receipt of His gifts by faith can worship be
said to be our offering to God.
The church's life in its worship is transcultural. The Law and Gospel message
of the church is otherworldly and is not a servant to satisfy the felt needs
of the world. Rather, felt needs provide an occasion for the clear proclamation
of Law and Gospel.
It
follows that not all humanly devised ceremonies faithfully
confess the presence of Christ in worship.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When it is taught that worship is essentially "celebration" rather
than receiving the mercies of Christ in His Word and Sacrament.
When man-centered ceremonies replace God-centered worship.
When orders of service are subjectively devised quite independently from orders
of worship that are the property of the church universal and that faithfully
confess and receive the presence of Christ in His Word and Sacrament.
When the church's preaching, teaching, music and worship are changed to be more
like the world in order to be accepted by the world.
When the church's solemn public worship is treated as a matter of experiment
and entertainment.
When the loving God-given practice of close(d) communion is abandoned for the
sake of perceived friendliness, inclusiveness in worship and numerical growth.
When so-called "liberty" in worship ceremonies, customs and rites
leads to orders of worship that compromise our confession (FC X). The Divine
Service includes those rites that confess the saving presence of the risen Christ
in His Gospel, such as confession and absolution, Law and Gospel preaching,
Creed, the Lord's Supper, prayer for the church universal, etc. (Ap. XXIV).
When music and hymnody used in worship focus principally on human sentiment
and emotion rather than on the Biblical content of the Christian faith.
When well-meaning pious language is substituted for the historic creeds of the
church.
V.
The Lutheran church has a distinct confessional
identity.
The
three Ecumenical Creeds (Apostles', Nicene and Athanasian) are to be upheld,
and initiatives to alter, amend, or replace them with contemporary compositions
must be resisted.
The Ecumenical Creeds articulate the faith confessed by the church universal,
as opposed to the teachings of heretics and sectarians (FC Ep. RN.3).
Because the language and expressions of the Creeds have been carefully refined,
any change in words or phrases may result in distortion or loss of the life-giving
truths confessed so clearly by the church down through the ages.
When the Ecumenical Creeds are subject to individualized reformulation, they
are no longer ecumenical nor are they what they have been for centuries, a tried
and true doctrinal standard.
Preaching and teaching provide the opportunity for presenting Lutheran Confessional
identity in the contemporary context.
The name Lutheran should be retained among congregations of the Lutheran Church--Missouri
Synod because "Lutheran" signifies not a cultic following of Martin
Luther but rather fidelity to Christ and His Word (Preface to the Book of Concord).
It
follows that Lutheran distinctives should not be
eliminated in favor of a generic Christianity.
Therefore, it is spiritual harmful:
When the name and confession known as "Lutheran" is replaced by a
generic Christian identity, which may include heterodox teaching and practice.
When the name Lutheran is removed from our churches, jeopardizing the visibility
of some of the key teachings of our Biblical confession, such as the real presence
and compromising conscientious Lutheran pastoral care exercised in the loving
Biblical practice of close(d) communion.
When a generic Christianity downplays controversial Biblical truths in favor
of a least-common-denominator approach to doctrine, practice, and fellowship,
thus compromising Christ's mission on earth (FC SD X, 5-7).
When pastors or congregations presume to change or alter the wording of the
Ecumenical Creeds to suit their local circumstances.
VI.
The "theology of the cross" defines
the mission and ministry of the church.
The Holy Spirit uses the "foolishness" of preaching Christ crucified
(1 Cor. 1:21) together with Holy Baptism and the Lord's Supper to build Christ's
church on earth.
This great treasure of the Gospel of the cross, and it alone, offers the power
of God for salvation to all mankind. Any alternate ways to build Christ's church
are illusory, essentially deny God's Word, and are contrary to God's revealed
will (Rom. 1:16; Gal. 1:6-10).
The risen Christ has won this salvation, not by what the world would recognize
as victory, but by the humiliation, suffering, and defeat of the cross (John
12:23-25; John 12:32).
As the Son of God, in taking the form of a servant, humbly hid His majesty in
the lowly manger and on the despised cross (Phil. 2: 6-11), so He continues
His work under the lowly cover of preaching and Sacraments. And just so He draws
close to His children in their sufferings and weakness (2 Cor. 12:9-10).
As at Pentecost, God built His church with dramatic increase in numbers through
the proclamation of the cross; so in the days of Noah, Elijah, and Jeremiah,
He built His church in times of decreasing numbers (1 Pet. 3:17-22).
Faithfulness on the part of pastor and congregation includes the work of evangelism,
that is, the proclamation of Christ crucified in community and world (1 Cor.
9:16-19; 1 Pet. 2:9; 3:15-16).
In an unbelieving world, as Christ's faithful bride, the church lives under
the cross, she may expect contempt, hardship, struggle, and suffering (Matt.
10:19-25; Mark 10:28-30).
It
follows that the "theology of glory" (the
wisdom of the world) misleads the church.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When spiritual life is measured in terms of personal happiness, earthly success
and appearance, worldly wisdom and human glory (1 Cor. 1:21-25).
When behavioral and social sciences are given a shared authority with the Word
of God as a measure of spiritual truth.
When it is thought that saving faith can be imparted by human market strategies
or that the growth of the Holy Christian Church can be adequately or accurately
measured by numbers (Matt. 7:13-14; 16:18; Acts 2:47; Col. 2:19).
When a congregation sees itself as necessarily more faithful because it is not
growing. Or, conversely, when a congregation views growing numbers and income
as an indication that Christ is necessarily building His church. Numbers, large
or small, are not a litmus test of the Gospel's power (Matt. 7:24-27).
When anything other than faithfulness by pastor or people to the pure Gospel
and Sacraments of Christ is used to measure the "health" of a congregation
(1 Cor. 2:2).
Part
Two: The
Cultural Issues
The
Church Growth Movement is an attempt to address the contemporary culture, which
has become increasingly secularized and in need of evangelization. The question
then becomes, to what extent should the church change its practices to accommodate
the culture? Clearly, Christians exist in a particular culture, as do the non-Christians
we hope to reach with the Gospel. The church must communicate in a language
and in a way that the surrounding culture can understand. On the other hand,
following the lead of a secularized culture can only lead to a secularized church.
Further complicating the matter is the fact of cultural pluralism. America today
embraces many different cultures, so that attempts to appeal to one (for example,
affluent white baby-boomers who live in the suburbs) may not appeal to others
(African-Americans, Hispanics, rural midwesterners, Generation-Xers). These
pluralistic cultures are themselves under assault from the commercial "pop
culture" which reduces all cultural expressions to a homogenized commodity
to buy and sell.
The Lutheran Church is blessed with a theology that offers a specific, comprehensive
framework for addressing the relationship between the church and culture. The
doctrine of the Two Kingdoms can help us address the cultural issues raised
by the Church Growth Movement in a positive way.
The Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions state that the world in essence
is essentially good but accidentally evil. (The Confessions utilize Aristotelian
terms to describe both "essence" and "accident"). Original
sin is not of the nature or essence of man (FC SD I.55-58). Therefore, the earth
is the Lord's. In Luther's two-kingdom paradigm, the kingdom of power is where
God operates as the Creator. It is not the world of Satan. Both Christians and
non-Christians co-exist in the kingdom of power.
I.
The Lutheran Theology of the Two Kingdoms teaches
that
God reigns in all cultures, but that the church is to be ruled
by the Word of God alone, and not by the culture.
The Two Kingdoms are defined as the Kingdom of Power, which God rules today
by virtue of His creation, and the Kingdom of Grace, which Jesus Christ rules
today by virtue of His redemption.
God's earthly kingdom--or "Kingdom of the Left Hand" or "Kingdom
of Power"--includes all persons in the world whether they are Christians
or non-Christians, and remains subject to God's Law, His created orders and
His providential care.
God's spiritual kingdom or "Kingdom of the Right Hand" or "Kingdom
of Grace"--includes only those persons who have been given faith in Jesus
Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit, are thus under the Gospel.
God's earthly kingdom is subject to human reason, cultural dynamics, and scientific
laws. God's spiritual kingdom is subject only to His Word. Both kingdoms belong
to God (AC and Ap., XIV, XVI, XXVIII).
God is active in His earthly kingdom, for both Christians and non-Christians,
through human vocations--the family, citizenship and the workplace--in order
to provide our daily bread and other needs of this life.
Christians are citizens of both kingdoms: the earthly kingdom by birth and the
spiritual kingdom by rebirth in Baptism.
Christians exercise their citizenship in the earthly kingdom in their vocation
and in the spiritual kingdom in the life of the church.
Christians are to be in the world, but not of the world (John 17:15-18).
The Two Kingdoms are not to be confused or mingled with each other.
› .The church is not to imitate the culture. Nor must individual Christians
think they must create some separate Christian culture or attempt to conquer
the world for Christ. God already reigns, even in the most secular culture among
those who do not know Him.
The church, as a supernatural institution present in the world and called into
being solely by God, is distinct from the culture, even as its members are constructively
engaged in the culture through their vocations.
It
follows that the culture is not to set the agenda for the Church.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When the church changes its teachings to follow prevailing cultural trends.
When theology is determined by cultural considerations rather than by the Word
of God.
When worship is shaped not by theology but by currently popular styles.
When Christians ignore their responsibilities to serve their neighbors and to
apply God's moral law in the cultures in which God has placed them.
When Christians believe that only "church work" is a valid way of
serving God, so that they neglect their earthly vocations.
When the church is operated as a purely secular corporation, with the pastor
functioning as the "C.E.O.," the elders being reduced to a Board of
Directors, and the congregation treated as workers, all organized according
to a business plan to market a product.
When the "Priesthood of All Believers" is taken to mean "every
member a minister." This view denigrates the secular vocations (in implying
that everyone ought to be engaged in ministerial functions to serve God, as
if their existing callings were not equally spiritual in God's sight). It also
can be used to denigrate the pastoral vocation (in implying that everyone can
do what the pastor has personally been called to do).
II.
American culture offers many blessings,
but
it currently includes features that can undermine the faith.
The American legacy of religious and political freedom, economic prosperity
and technological progress is a great blessing from the hand of God.
Though God continues to work in today's secular culture, many of our cultural
problems can be seen in terms of human rebellion against God's kingdom.
Certain thought-patterns in American culture, however appropriate in the earthly
kingdom, can raise problems when brought into the spiritual kingdom of the church.
The
American philosophy of pragmatism aims only at quantifiable results, assuming
that the desired outcomes can be produced when the barriers are removed. Such
a view--concerned only with the question "Does it work?"--often neglects
issues of objective truth and the radical consequences of the Fall.
American culture is often oriented to hedonism, which makes human pleasure the
highest priority. This view caters to our sinful flesh.
American culture is influenced by utilitarianism, which evaluates ideas and
principles in terms of their usefulness. This view is human-centered and, when
applied to moral decisions, rejects the absolutes of God's Word.
American culture promotes subjectivism, which evaluates knowledge and values
on the basis of personal inner feelings. This view neglects the objective truths
ordained by God.
Americans are often consequentialists, believing that the end justifies the
means. This view justifies negative behavior in the name of an ultimate good,
a position that rationalizes sin and violates God's Law.
Today's postmodern culture denies that there are any absolutes. Truth is relative;
morality is relative; and religion is nothing more than a privatized, interior
meaning-system with no connection to transcendent realities.
It
follows that adjusting the church's practice to appeal to
today's American culture, as advocated by the Church Growth Movement, will be
particularly problematic.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When the "success" of a particular church is assumed to consist in
quantifiable results, such as its budget or its number of new members.
When pragmatic or utilitarian considerations--however helpful in their sphere
assume an authority over that of God's Word.
When worship is shaped by the hedonistic desire for entertainment.
When subjective religious experience takes the place of the Word and the Sacraments.
When certain doctrinally-based features of the church--its liturgy, hymns, moral
stances, theological teachings, or culturally unpopular practices (such as close[d]
communion and refusal to ordain women)--are construed as barriers that need
to be eliminated for the church to grow.
When it is assumed that the church grows through the application of principles,
prescriptions, programs and other human actions, as opposed to the work of the
Holy Spirit in the Means of Grace.
III.
Cultural pluralism does not mean cultural relativism;
rather, it means that the church has the opportunity to
reach out to human beings in all of their God-given diversity.
Though
America has its distinct cultural qualities, America is also a land of cultural
pluralism. There have always been many different cultures that constitute America,
and the rise of immigration and the acceleration of generational differences
are rapidly increasing our cultural diversity.
The various cultures of the world and within this country experience God's manifold
blessings in His earthly kingdom, even though these cultures are tainted by
sin.
Folk cultures of every kind, with their traditional values and ethnic identities,
are being undermined by a homogenous popular culture, which has its origins
in mass technology and economic consumerism.
Whereas the music, customs, and other artifacts of ethnic cultures transmit
and preserve community values, artifacts of the pop culture exist to be bought
and sold to the largest possible market.
The pop culture favors products that entertain, that do not demand thought or
effort on the part of its audience, and that satisfy the subjective tastes of
the buyers.
The pop culture also is eroding the high culture, the realm of human achievement,
education, and expertise. Quality music, literature and art are giving way to
the shallowness of pop music, soap operas and computer games.
¹
.The fact of cultural diversity does not mean that truth or morality are relative;
rather, all cultures are limited in their knowledge, tainted by sin, and are
in need of the transcendent truths of God's Word.
Christ died for all peoples. The same Gospel is for all the world (Acts 1: 8).
God's Word is not culturally-specific nor culture-bound. Christianity is for
"every tribe and language and people and nation" (Rev. 5:9).
The historic church, unified in all of its diversity in the one Lord Jesus Christ,
embraces every time, extending back through history, constituting a communion
of all the saints who still worship their Lord in heaven.
The Christian church--with its universal claims, its liturgies that have transcended
times and places and nationalities, and its message that continues to change
the hearts of people in every nation, tribe and language--is the one genuinely
multi-cultural institution.
It
follows that, in a climate of cultural diversity, the
church must recover its universality.
Therefore,
it is spiritually harmful:
When the church emulates the commercial pop culture at the expense of traditional
Biblical practices.
When the transient styles of pop music drive out classic hymns and liturgies
that have withstood the test of time.
When church practices are judged by their entertainment value, rather than by
their Scriptural faithfulness.
When different messages are devised for different cultures or sub-cultures.
When the church is divided upon cultural or generational lines, violating the
unity of diverse peoples in the Body of Christ (Gal. 3:28; 1 Cor. 12:12-31).
When the church, attempting to blend into a homogenized culture, does not affirm
its unique identity.
When
a congregation aims at an undifferentiated, generic Christianity, rather than
taking its distinct place as the Holy Christian Church in a diverse religious
landscape.
When the church attempts to appeal to only one segment within the congregation,
thereby dividing God's people against each other.
When the cultural range of the church is narrowed by adapting to a single, momentary
cultural expression (such as that of white, middle-class baby-boomers) that
will soon pass away.
When Christians become culturally parochial, neglecting missions and outreach
to people different from themselves.
When the church changes with each prevailing culture and with every new generation,
thereby losing its catholicity, pitting cultures and generations against each
other, and, ironically, losing its relevance to any culture.
When
to Follow the Culture and When to Counter the Culture
Christians
are to be engaged in their cultures, being "in the world, but not of the
world," acting in their vocations as parents, citizens and workers. At
the same time, the spiritual kingdom, found in the church, is to be separate
from the world, governed not by human reason nor by human power but solely by
the Word of God.
Matters of culture are susceptible to change, revision and sociological applications
(under God's Law). Matters of theology, on the other hand, are subject to God's
Word alone, and may not be altered for cultural considerations.
Community
dynamics are cultural
Churches
should be sensitive to their local cultures. The value placed upon "friendliness"--and
the different ways of expressing it from culture to culture--should be appreciated.
Other local customs should be respected and used as means of outreach into the
community.
Demographic research and other information about the community can be helpful
in the process of church planting and evangelism. Social issues, particular
needs of people in the congregation, and cultural problems should also be the
concern of the local church.
Worship
is intrinsically theological
The
church's worship is the worship by the baptized, those who are gathered in the
name of the Holy Trinity. The church's worship is not primarily for outreach
to unbelievers. How the church worships should be determined according to its
theology, not according to human desires, popular tastes or cultural trends.
Though certain practices in worship are adiaphora, those too are matters of
theological emphasis, not cultural accommodation. Though changes in worship
are sometimes necessary so that worshipers can better understand its significance,
they are to be done in a theological way.
The development of liturgies and hymns is a complex process, requiring scholarship,
in-depth theological analysis and musical expertise--as evidenced in the Synod's
new hymn book project. Over the course of this ten-year project, the LCMS has
the opportunity to reconcile the varying claims of the traditional and the contemporary,
and other controversies. It is to be hoped that the new hymnal will be adopted
by all of our congregations, thereby restoring Scriptural and confessional coherence
in worship.
Communication
is cultural
Language,
thought-forms and ways of thinking change from culture to culture, and in a
single culture over time. Churches must communicate the unchanging truths of
God's Word in a way that they will be understood.
But because the Christian church is bound to God's Word, the focus will be on
language--specifically, God's language in Scripture--which is the substance
of our liturgy, our preaching, and our teaching.
Preaching
is theological
A
sermon must always be the proclamation of the Law and the Gospel, in which God
Himself promises to work in a powerful way.
It is being said by some Church Growth proponents that "people don't want
to hear about sin"; they want a more positive, affirming message that builds
up their self-esteem. This approach eliminates the Law. Since "self-esteem"
theology encourages faith in oneself--rather than in Christ--it also eliminates
the Gospel.
Another motif of Church Growth homiletics is that people want "practical
Biblical guidelines" for everyday life, instead of heavy-duty theology.
The most popular sermons, therefore, will draw principles from the Bible about
practical issues--such as how to manage money, how to handle family problems,
and how to avoid stress. Such sermons, in one sense, are all "Law,"
but they manage to water down the Law so that it seems easily achievable, a
matter of self-help rules, rather than the demands of a righteous God. Such
sermons, however popular, can never bring anyone into faith.
Certainly, the Scriptures give guidance for life, and the Third Use of the Law
has an important function in the Christian life. But pastors must be very careful
to avoid the cultural temptation to preach sermons that are merely "therapeutic,"
as opposed to bringing their listeners to repentance, through the Law, and to
faith, through the Gospel of free forgiveness through the death and resurrection
of Jesus Christ.
Technology
is cultural
The
advance of the Reformation was greatly aided by the invention of the printing
press, the technological innovation that made it possible for everyone to own
and to read the Bible. By the same token, other technological developments should
be gladly embraced by the church as ways to help fulfill its mission.
The LCMS was a pioneer in using radio and television to spread the Gospel. Today,
the Internet and other information technologies hold great potential for use
by the church.
We can agree with Church Growth experts on such things as the need for plenty
of free parking, which is merely an acknowledgment of the importance of transportation
technology in contemporary American culture.
Teaching
is theological
If there are no moral absolutes, if God's Word is not objectively true, if religion
is no more than a private, interior consolation with no reference to a transcendent,
universal reality--as today's culture tends to believe--then Christianity is
completely invalid. The teaching of the church, in this cultural climate, must
be more thorough, more intentional, and more wide-ranging than ever.
The Great Commission says to "make disciples of all nations, baptizing
them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching
them to obey everything I have commanded you." (Matthew 28: 19) The Greek
word for "disciple" includes the sense of being a student; the text
is rigorously sacramental, emphasizing both Baptism and Christ's real presence
in the church; and it stresses the necessity of teaching "everything"
in God's Word, as Jesus said: "If you continue in My Word, you are truly
My disciples, and you will know the truth and the truth will make you free."(John
8:31-32)
The key to how well the church thrives in today's culture is surely in how well
and how thoroughly the church teaches. This is not a time to cut back church
membership classes to one Saturday afternoon, as some are doing. This is not
a time to turn Bible classes and the Sunday School into "sharing times,"
rather than training in God's Word. This is not a time to minimize doctrine,
morality and discernment of error. Rather, the church must pay new attention
to catechesis, not only of young people and new members but of the whole congregation
struggling to live as Christians in a non-Christian culture.
Lutheran
Evangelism in American Culture
The
church grows in numbers through evangelism, when unbelievers hear the Good News
of Jesus and receive the gift of faith. This is the work of the Holy Spirit
operating through the Means of Grace. Calling into question certain features
of the Church Growth Movement should by no means lessen our churches' commitment
to evangelize the lost.
The Reformation under the leadership of Martin Luther emphasized how God provides
the growth of His church through the Word and the Sacraments. "The Holy
Spirit does not come without the Word," he wrote, "but He wants to
come through the harp, that is, through meditation on the Word or through the
voices of father, mother, or others. Otherwise, the devil comes" (Stl.
2:263).
Luther was so convinced of the power of the Spirit working through the Word
that he explained the meaning of the Third Article of the Apostles' Creed in
those terms: "I believe that I cannot by my own reason or strength believe
in Jesus Christ, my Lord, or come to Him; but the Holy Spirit has called me
with the Gospel, enlightened me with His gifts, sanctified and kept me in the
true faith" (SC, Third Article).
The Lutheran Confessions emphasize what causes true growth. Speaking of the
Gospel and the Sacraments, the Augsburg Confession says, "Through these,
as through means, He [God] gives the Holy Spirit, who works faith, when and
where He pleases, in those who hear the Gospel" (AC V).
In America, The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod from the beginning was evangelistically-minded,
emphasizing how God provides growth in the church through Word and Sacrament.
C. F. W. Walther, one of the key founders and the first president of the LCMS,
wrote, "A congregation should do its share that the Gospel may be brought
to those sitting in darkness and the shadow of death . . ."[11]
Reflecting upon our Synod's past and future, a pastor said over forty years
ago, "In addition to the responsibility of keeping safe every soul in the
church for the Lord Jesus, the church also has the responsibility to conduct
an effective soul-winning program."[12]
God
has truly blessed The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod as we have used His Word
and Sacraments. We now have more than 2.5 million members in more than 6,000
congregations and students in more than 1,000 schools--the largest parochial
school system of all Protestant churches. We have two seminaries that are preparing
men of God who proclaim the clear Word of God.
Today our Synodical president, Dr. A. L. Barry, is encouraging our entire church
body to "Tell the Good News About Jesus" in the years 2000 to 2010.
He put it this way at the Synod's 1998 convention: "As we move into the
final years of this present century, and the opening years of the next, we are
going, with great zeal, to reach out to those around us who do not know Jesus
Christ and the Good News of His salvation. And we are going to do it with untiring
vigor in the Lord." The Synod in convention wholeheartedly adopted the
outreach emphasis of "Tell the Good News About Jesus." There could
not be a better theme and motive for a church body that believes and practices
that God causes His growth through the means that He has given us, the Word
and Sacraments.
These means do, in fact, bring people to faith, as they have for centuries.
Dire warnings that churches will "die" unless new and questionable
methods are employed cast doubt upon God's faithfulness and His active work
in bringing sinners to Himself. We do not need anything new or unique to cause
growth; God can and will grow His church by the means God has given the church.
Conclusion:
Tell
the Good News About Jesus!
Apostles,
pastors and people have been doing that ever since Pentecost. When persecution
scattered the first believers, "those who had been scattered preached the
word wherever they went." (Acts 8:4) This has been the consistent pattern
also in The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod. Blessed by God with fidelity to
His saving Word and dedication to His mission for more than 150 years, our passion
continues to be "Tell the Good News About Jesus!"
To be practical, that comes down to you in your daily life within the home and
society, and to your local congregation as the church in the world. Pastors
and congregation leaders should jointly study this report, seeking to bring
their congregation's worship life and outreach into harmony with Scripture and
our Lutheran Confessions. Then out of loyalty to Christ and love for the lost,
each congregation must explore new opportunities to tell the Good News, asking
such questions as:
How can we bring the secular world to the church without secularizing the church?
What opportunities do we have to "teach (all nations) all things"
in our community?
What classes can we offer our community, and in what new locations that will
reach the hearts and lives of people with the Gospel?
How can we train members to be sponsors for inquirers, accompanying them to
adult catechetical classes and serving as mentors in Christian faith and life?
What locations in our community lend themselves to distribution of Christian
tracts, books and literature?
How can we develop and publicize a web site for our church that is not only
attractive, but also informative and invites contact with us?
How can we strengthen our members as royal priests in their daily vocations,
demonstrating Christian virtue in a culture growing increasingly godless and
wicked?
How can we build relationships between our members to assist each person in
his/her vocation and to strengthen marriage and the family?
How can our worship publicly confess the unseen reality of the presence of the
Holy Trinity among us, with all His life-giving gifts of forgiveness, life and
salvation?
There are countless ways to get the attention of people outside of the church
so that they will hear the Gospel. We can convert no one. The Spirit of God
does that. What we can do is our best to bring the greatest numbers possible
into contact with God's Word and Sacraments. These Means of Grace are at the
heart and center of a Lutheran understanding of the growth of Christ's church.
From the weekly gathering around the pulpit and altar, God's baptized people
go forth each week to serve Him in their daily lives. Refreshed and renewed
by His Word and Supper, they bear His Word in their hearts and on their lips--and
that Word will not return void. All those who hear and believe also will be
gathered into Christ's church in earth and heaven. This is our conviction in
The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod. And so God's mission continues among us
and through us: Tell the Good News About Jesus!
Recommendations
In light of these theological and cultural considerations of the Church Growth
Movement, the following recommendations are made:
1. That the President of the Synod share this study with other Synodical entities,
including doctrinal reviewers.
2. That district presidents, members of boards and commissions, and others who
supervise Synodical programs, auxiliaries and RSOs consider the issues raised
in this report as they plan programs and documents for use within the church.
3. That pastors use this report in their studies within their circuits and districts,
and as they serve their congregations in their ministries.
4. That congregations of The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod work towards a
greater unity in their worship through the use of Synodically-approved hymnbooks
and liturgies.
5. That congregations commit themselves to the work of evangelism, trusting
in the power of God's Word, rather than in humanly-devised systems.
To
Address the Church Growth Movement
1995 Convention Resolution 3-09
Overtures 3-104--106 (CW, pp. 182-83)
Whereas,
Holy Scripture teaches, "So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by
the Word of God" (Rom. 10:17). And again, our God says: "As rain and
snow come down from heaven . . . so will My word be that I speak. It will not
return to Me empty but it will accomplish what I want and achieve what I had
in mind" (Is. 55:10-11). And again, "He saved us, not because of any
righteous works which we have done, but because of His mercy. He saved us by
the washing in which the Holy Spirit gives us a new birth and a new life"
(Titus 3:5). And of the Holy Supper our Lord Jesus says concerning His own body
and blood, "Take, eat, Ö My body given for you Ö Drink Ö My blood, poured
out for you for the forgiveness of sins" (Matt. 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24;
Luke 22:19-20; 1 Cor. 11:23-25); and
Whereas, Martin Luther, therefore, taught us that there is only one way in which
people are both brought to faith in Christ and caused to grow in this faith,
namely: "the Holy Spirit has called me by the Gospel, enlightened
me with His gifts, sanctified and kept me in the true faith. In the same way
He calls, gathers, enlightens, and sanctifies the whole Christian church on
earth" (SC II 6). And, also in the Augsburg Confession we confess: "In
order to obtain such faith God instituted the office of the ministry [German:
das Predigtamt], that is, provided the Gospel and the Sacraments. Through
these, as through means, He gives the Holy Spirit, who works faith, when
and where He pleases, in those who hear the Gospel" (V 1, emphasis
added); and
Whereas, Some Church Growth materials and practices are a denial of the efficacy
of the Means of Grace, e.g., reliance upon principles, programs, processes,
and contemporary social and behavioral sciences to produce numerical growth
in the church (Evangelism and Church Growth, CTCR 1987; pp. 40-42); and
Whereas, Some Church Growth materials and practices suggest that numerical growth
in the church depends upon the proper discovery, development, and employment
of "spiritual gifts" (Evangelism and Church Growth, CTCR 1987; pp.
43-44); and
Whereas, In much of Church Growth materials, as well as in actual practice,
there is a confusion of the Priesthood of All Believers with the Office of the
Holy Ministry, e.g., the pastor as manager and organizer, a misunderstanding
of the Call, and a misunderstanding of Christian vocation (Evangelism and Church
Growth, CTCR 1987; pp. 42-43); and
Whereas, The Church Growth Movement often promotes worship forms and practices
which focus the worshipper on his feelings and experiences as evidence of God's
grace rather than on the objective and gracious work of God delivering His forgiveness
of sins for Christ's sake through Word and Sacrament, as found, for example,
in the historic liturgy of the Lutheran Church (Evangelism and Church Growth,
CTCR 1987; pp. 41-42); therefore be it
Resolved, That circuit and District pastoral conferences, District staffs, and
congregations of Synod be urged to study the CTCR report Evangelism and Church
Growth, the report from The Standing Committee for Pastoral Ministry titled
Toward a Theological Basis, Understanding and Use of Church Growth Principles
in The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, as well as other resources which
critically examine the Church Growth Movement, e.g., "Church Growth"
As Mission Paradigm: A Lutheran Assessment by Kurt Marquart, and Dining
with the Devil: The Megachurch Movement Flirts with Modernity by Os Guiness;
and be it further
Resolved, That congregations, Districts and entities of the Synod which are
using Church Growth materials and practices examine them carefully and use them
with proper discernment; and be it further
Resolved, That the Lutheran Witness, Reporter and other publications of the
Synod report on the errors in some Church Growth materials and practices and
also in fairness show how some materials and practices may be used in the service
of the Gospel and the advancement of the Kingdom; and be it further
Resolved, That the President of the Synod consider appointing a committee to
study and address how the truth of the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions
might be clearly proclaimed in light of the Church Growth Movement and the influences
of American culture and pluralism; and be it finally
Resolved, That the findings of this committee, if appointed, be shared with
all of the Synod as soon as possible.
Notes
1. Toward a Theological Basis, Understanding and Use of Church Growth Principles
in The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, Prepared by The Church Growth Strategy
Task Force of the Standing Committee for Pastoral Ministry (St. Louis: Board
for Higher Education Services, The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, 1991); Evangelism
and Church Growth (St. Louis: The Commission on Theology and Church Relations
of The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod, 1987).
2.
C. Peter Wagner, Win Arn, and Elmer Towns, eds., "A Glossary of Church
Growth Terms," Church Growth: State of the Art (Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale,
1986), p. 284.
3.
Kent R. Hunter, Foundations for Church Growth (New Haven, Mo.: Leader
Publishing Company, 1983), p. 23.
4.
Hunter, Foundations, p. 29.
5.
Ken Sidey, "Church Growth Fine Tunes Its Formulas," Christianity
Today (June 24, 1991), p. 45.
6.
Donald McGavran, Understanding Church Growth, third edition, revised
and edited by C. Peter Wagner, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company,
1990).
7.
Sidey, p. 46.
8.
C. Peter Wagner, Your Church Can Grow (Ventura, Calif.: Regal Books,
1976), p. 58.
9.
Carl F. George, Prepare Your Church for the Future (Tarrytown, NY: F.
H. Revell, 1991), p. 41.
10.
Kent R. Hunter and David L. Bahn, Confessions of a Church Growth Enthusiast
(Lima, Ohio: Fairway Press, 1997).
11.
C.F.W. Walther, The Proper Form of an Evangelical Lutheran Congregation Independent
of the State, translated by J.T. Mueller (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing
House, Reprinted 1987), Thesis 65, p. 185-186.
12.
Carl Gaertner, The Means of Grace in an Effective Church Program in Volume
III of The Abiding Word (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1960),
p. 415.
Members
of the Church Growth Study Committee
Pastor
Phill Andresen
Immanuel Lutheran Church
Spirit Lake, Iowa
Pastor
Jack Baumgarn
Trinity
Lutheran Church
St. Francis, Minnesota
Pastor
John Domsch
Hope Lutheran Church
Topeka, Kansas
Dr.
Robert Kuhn
First Vice-President, LCMS
Saint Louis, Missouri
Dr.
Charles Manske
President Emeritus
Concordia University
Irvine, California
Professor
Kurt Marquart
Concordia
Theological Seminary
Fort Wayne, Indiana
Dr.
Dale Meyer
Lutheran Hour Speaker
St. Louis, Missouri
Pastor
Harold Senkbeil
Elm Grove Lutheran Church
Elm Grove, Wisconsin
Dr.
Gene Edward Veith
Concordia University
Mequon, Wisconsin
Dr. Richard Warneck
Concordia Seminary
Saint Louis, Missouri
Pastor
Kenneth Wieting
Luther Memorial Chapel
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
©
2001
The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod
The Church Growth Study Committee
1333 South Kirkwood Road
Saint Louis, Missouri 63122
This
document may be copied and used for noncommercial study purposes as long as
no changes are made to the contents. Copies must bear the following notice either
on the title page or reverse thereof of each copy, or in a location where it
can be readily perceived by the reader: "For the Sake of Christ's Commission:
The Report of The Church Growth Study Committee of The Lutheran Church--Missouri
Synod. Copyright 2001. Used by permission." Any other use of this document
is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of The Lutheran
Church--Missouri Synod.
Printed
copies of For the Sake of Christ's Commission may be obtained from Concordia
Publishing House, 800-325-3040.
|