What
Are the Lutheran Confessions?
The Spirit in Which
They Were Written
We use the word "confession"
in a variety of ways today. A young man confesses his love for his fiancee.
A criminal confesses to a felony. Christians confess their sins to a fellow
believer or at the appropriate time in the church service. The Lutheran Confessions
are something quite different from all that. They are written, formal statements
with which a group of Christians, or an individual, declare to the world their
faith, their deepest and undaunted convictions.
The Lutheran Confessions
represent the result of more than 50 years of earnest endeavor by Martin Luther
and his followers to give Biblical and clear expression to their religious convictions.
The important word in that definition is the word "convictions." This
word reveals the spirit in which the Lutheran Confessions were written, not
a spirit of hesitation or doubt, but of deepest confidence that Lutherans, when
they were writing and subscribing the Concessions and creeds, because their
content was all drawn from the Word of God, Scripture, were affirming the truth,
the saving truth.
Listen to what the Lutheran
confessors say in the very last paragraph of the Book of Concord (FC SD, XII,
40), a statement that describes their assurance and their doctrinal certainty:
Therefore, it is our intent to
give witness before God and all Christendom, among those who are alive today
and those who will come after us, that the explanation here set forth regarding
all the controversial articles of faith which we have addressed and explainedand
no other explanationis our teaching, faith, and confession. In it we
shall appear before the judgment throne of Jesus Christ, by God's grace, with
fearless hearts and thus give account of our faith, and we will neither secretly
nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it. Instead, on the strength
of God's grace we intend to abide by this confession.
Here we observe that
those who wrote and signed the Lutheran Confessions were not merely settling
controversies, or expressing opinions, or devising new and clever doctrinal
formulations. They were confessing their faith and expressing their determination
never to depart from that confession. They take their stand as in the presence
of God and stake their very salvation on the doctrine they confess. So confident
are they of their position, so certain of their doctrine, that they dare bind
not only themselves but also their posterity to it. And in another place they
show their willingness to submit themselves not only to the content but to the
very phrases of their confession: "We have determined not to depart even a finger's
breadth either from the subjects themselves, or from the phrases which are found
in [the Confessions]" (Preface of the Book of Concord, quoted from Concordia
Triglotta [St. Louis: Concordia, 1921], p. 23).
I am sure that such
a profession seems like an impossible anachronism today, a mark of inflexible
pride which can no longer be respected or emulated by enlightened people. But
certainly with such expressions of certainty the Confessions have captured the
spirit of Christ and the New Testament. Our Lord taught with authority and promised
His disciples that they would "know the truth." And how often does the inspired
apostle Paul dogmatically affirm, "I know," "I speak the truth ... .. I am persuaded"!
The Lutheran confessors
are convinced that Christians, basing their doctrine on Scripture and the promises
of God, can be certain of their salvation and can formulate and confess true
statements about God and all the articles of the Christian faith. It is this
spirit in which all our Confessions were written and in which they so eloquently
give witness to the Gospel of Christ.
The Importance of
Doctrine
According to the Lutheran
Confessions, true doctrine, i. e., correct teaching about God and His activity
toward us, is not some remote possibility but a marvelous fact, the result of
God's grace; and this doctrine is demonstrated in the Confessions themselves.
Those who wrote our Confessions were convinced of this (FC SD, Rule and Norm,
13); but more than that, they were persuaded that true doctrine, theology (which
means language about God), is of inestimable importance to the church and to
individual Christians. Why?
1. It is first and foremost
by pure doctrine that we honor God and hallow His name, as we pray in the First
Petition of the Small Catechism. "For," Luther says, "there is nothing he would
rather hear than to have his glory and praise exalted above everything and his
Word taught in its purity and cherished and treasured" (LC, 111, 48).
2. It is by agreement
in the pure doctrine that permanent concord and harmony can be achieved in the
church. "In order to preserve the pure doctrine and to maintain a thorough,
lasting, and God-pleasing concord within the church, it is essential not only
to present the true and wholesome doctrine correctly, but also to accuse the
adversaries who teach otherwise (I Tim. 3:9; Titus 1:9; 2 Tim. 2:24; 3:16)"
(FC SD, Rule and Norm, 14).
3. Doctrine is important
to Lutherans because they believe that Christian doctrine is not a human fabrication
but originates in God. It is God's revealed teaching about Himself and all He
has done for us in Christ. Therefore Luther says confidently and joyfully: "The
doctrine is not ours but God's" (WA, 17 11, 233). And he will risk everything
for the doctrine, for to compromise would do harm to God and to all the world.
Luther's spirit is echoed throughout our Confessions as they affirm that their
doctrine is "drawn from and conformed to the Word of God" (FC SD, Rule and Norm,
5, 10).
4. Pure Christian doctrine
is important for our Lutheran Confessions because it brings eternal salvation.
It "alone is our guide to salvation" (Preface to the Book of Concord, Concordia
Triglotta, p. 11). For this reason our Confessions call it "heavenly doctrine"
and they never fail to show and apply this saving aim of evangelical doctrine.
This emphasis on the
importance of Christian doctrine is often not understood or appreciated in our
day of relativism and indifference.
How often do modem church
leaders declaim that the church will never achieve purity of doctrine; nor is
it necessary! Therefore we should concentrate our efforts toward ministry to
people in their needs. The longest article in our Confessions deals with good
works and ministry to people in their needs (Ap, IV, 122-400) and insistently
admonishes the church to follow such an enterprise. But this does not make doctrine
less important! Today when people are leaving the church in droves and abandoning
the faith, we must keep our priorities straight.
Luther says:
The great difference between doctrine
and life is obvious, even as the difference between heaven and earth. Life
may be unclean, sinful, and inconsistent; but doctrine must be pure, holy,
sound, unchanging ... not a tittle or letter may be omitted, however much
life may fail to meet the requirements of doctrine. This is so because doctrine
is God's Word, and God's truth alone, whereas life is partly our own doing....
God will have patience with man's moral failings and imperfections and forgive
them. But He cannot, will not, and shall not tolerate a man's altering or
abolishing doctrine itself. For doctrine involves His exalted, divine Majesty
itself (WA, 30 111, 343 f.)
Strong words! But this
is the spirit of confessional Lutheranism.
Again theologians remind
us today that what matters for the Christian is his faith relation to Christ:
Faith is directed toward Christ and not a body of doctrine. Of course! And how
often do our Confessions stress just this point! But the Christ in whom we believe
and live and hope is not a phantom or myth, but the very Son of God who became
a man, who really lived and suffered and died as our Substitute, and who rose
again for our justification. In short, He is the Christ of whom we can speak
meaningfully and cognitively; and the minute we begin to speak about Him and
confess Him, we are speaking doctrine.
Again we are told that
we are saved by Christ, not by pure doctrine. True! But does this make pure
doctrine unimportant? We are not saved by good works or social concern either.
But does that make social concern and works of love of no account? No, pure
doctrine has its function. It enables us to glorify God with our lips, to teach
and proclaim a pure and saving Gospel and not a false gospel, to bring poor
sinners to know their true condition and to know God as He is, a wonderful and
gracious Savior, and not to flounder seeking and chasing phantoms.
Let us take our Confessions
seriously when they see pure doctrine as a wonderful gift and instrument for
glorifying God and building His church. This was Paul's conviction: "Take heed
unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them; for in doing this thou
shalt both save thyself and them that hear thee" (1 Tim. 4:16).
Confessional Subscription,
an Evangelical Act
Lutherans have always
held that creeds and confessions are necessary for the well-being of the church.
Just as Christ's church and all Christians are called upon to confess their
faith (Matt. 10:32; Rom. 10:9; 1 Peter 3:15; 1 John 4:2), so the church, if
it is to continue to proclaim the pure Gospel in season and out of season, must
for many reasons construct formal and permanent symbols and confessions and
require pastors and teachers to subscribe these confessions. It is impossible
for the church to be a nonconfessional church, just as impossible as to be a
nonconfessing church. And so today and ever since the Reformation Lutheran churches
over the world have required their pastors to subscribe the Lutheran Confessions.
What does this mean?
With her confessions the church is speaking to the world, but also to God, who
has spoken to her in His Word--speaking to Him in total commitment, speaking
to Him by an unequivocal, unconditional response in the spirit of, "We believe,
teach, and confess" (FC Ep, Rule and Norm, 1). This response is Scriptural,
taken from Scripture itself. How often do we read in our Confessions that the
teaching presented is "grounded in God's Word"! And so the Confessions are no
more than a kind of "comprehensive summary, rule, and norm," grounded in the
Word of God, "according to which all doctrines should be judged and the errors
which intruded should be explained and decided in a Christian way" (FC Ep, Heading).
This would be an unbelievably arrogant position to take, were it not for the
fact that all the doctrine of our Confessions is diligently and faithfully drawn
from Scripture.
And so when the Lutheran
pastor subscribes the Lutheran Confessions (and the confirmand or layman confesses
his belief in the Catechism [LC, Preface, 19]), this is a primary way in which
he willingly and joyfully and without reservation or qualification confesses
his faith and proclaims to the world what his belief and doctrine and confession
really are. Dr. C. F. W. Walther, the father of the Missouri Synod, long ago
explained the meaning of confessional subscription, and his words are as cogent
today as when they were first written:
An unconditional subscription
is the solemn declaration which the individual who wants to serve the church
makes under oath (1) that he accepts the doctrinal content of our Symbolical
Books, because he recognizes the fact that it is in full agreement with Scripture
and does not militate against Scripture in any point, whether that point be
of major or minor importance; (2) that he therefore heartily believes in this
divine truth and is determined to preach this doctrine.... Whether the subject
be dealt with expressly or only incidentally, an unconditional subscription
refers to the whole content of the Symbols and does not allow the subscriber
to make any mental reservation in any point. Nor will he exclude such doctrines
as are discussed incidentally in support of other doctrines, because the fact
that they are so stamps them as irrevocable articles of faith and demands
their joyful acceptance by everyone who subscribes the Symbols.
This is precisely how
the Confessions themselves understand subscription (FC Ep, Rule and Norm, 3,
5, 6; SD, Rule and Norm, 1, 2, 5).
Needless to say, confessional
subscription in the nature of the case is binding and unconditional. A subscription
with qualifications or reservations is a contradiction in terms and dishonest.
Today many Lutherans
claim that such an unconditional subscription is legalistic. Sometimes they
assert that such a position is pompous and not even honest.
We might respond: What
can possibly be wrong about confessing our faith freely and taking our confession
seriously? For it is the freest and most joyful act in the world for those of
us who have searched these great confessional writings and found them to be
Scriptural and evangelical to subscribe them. Of course, to force or bribe or
wheedle a person into subscribing them would be an awful sin and a denial of
what our Confessions are, namely symbols, standards around which Christians
rally willingly and joyfully in all their Christian freedom.
Confessions Are the
Voice of the Church
When I was a boy my
father told me a curious story about an occurrence in the 19th century. During
the controversy among Lutherans concerning predestination, the old Norwegian
Synod sided with the Missouri Synod. One member of the Norwegian Synod demurred
vehemently and in his consternation said, "I am the Norwegian Synod." That,
of course, was an absurdity, just as it would be absurd for me to claim, "I
am the church." The church, as we shall see, 16 according to our Confessions
is the total of all believers in Christ.
So it is, in a similar
sense, with the Confessions. They do not belong to Luther or Melanchthon or
those who, sometimes after great struggles, wrote them. They belong to those
for whom they were written, the church. Princes subscribed the Augsburg Confession
on behalf of their churches. Luther's catechisms were finally subscribed because
the lay people had already accepted them. Thousands of clergy subscribed the
entire Book of Concord, and the only reason the laity did not do so was the
length of the book. All this suggests two things.
First, that every Lutheran
ought to be concerned with what is rightfully his and ought to agree with the
doctrine of the Confessions. But it suggests also that, if the Confessions really
belong to the entire church, then everyone in the church ought to be united
in the evangelical doctrine of the Confessions. That was the case when the Book
of Concord was compiled in 1580, and it ought to be the case today.
Doctrinal Unanimity,
a Blessing to the Church
The Church of the Reformation
after the death of Luther in one respect resembled the congregation at Corinth
in the first century: It was a church highly endowed with the gifts of the Spirit,
but at the same time tragically confused and divided. To the Corinthian congregation
Paul wrote: "Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you;
but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment"
(1 Cor. 1:10). Paul had no quarrel with the diversity of spiritual gifts he
found in that congregation; he rejoiced in all that, provided it did not polarize
the church. But there is only one Christ, he says, who is undivided; one Gospel;
and all Christians are to be of the same mind and judgment, united in their
faith and doctrine.
The Church of the Reformation
took Paul's admonition seriously when after Luther's death doctrinal controversies
arose and threatened to destroy its unity in the Gospel. The Lutheran churches
recognized that the unity of the Spirit which Paul stressed could only be manifested
when there was unanimity "in doctrine and in all its articles and ... the right
use of the holy sacraments" (FC SD, X, 31). Their program for unity and concord
in a troubled church went as follows: "The primary requirement for basic and
permanent concord within the church is a summary formula and pattern, unanimously
approved, in which the summarized doctrine commonly confessed by the churches
of the pure Christian religion is drawn together out of the Word of God" (FC
SD, Rule and Norm, 1).
What a remarkable statement!
Here is not the cynical despairing of the possibility of doctrinal unity, so
common to our relativistic age! Not the sneering rejection of doctrinal unanimity
as something inimical to man's freedom and autonomy. No, here is a statement
of confidence in the unifying power of the Word and Spirit of God. These old
Lutherans were convinced that doctrinal controversies were an offense and doctrinal
aberrations pernicious to believers and unbelievers alike. "The opinions of
the erring party cannot be tolerated in the church of God," they said, "much
less be excused and defended" (FC SD, Intro., 9). But at the same time they
maintained with Paul-like optimism that unity in doctrine and all its articles
was not a remote possibility, not an impossible goal at the end of a rainbow,
but a wonderful blessing that could be achieved by the church which would bow
to the Word of God and allow the Spirit to rule in all its life.
And so the Lutheran
confessors dare to produce a confession which all are asked to sign and which
represents the unanimous declaration of all. They pledge themselves to the Book
of Concord and confess: "We have from our hearts and with our mouths declared
in mutual agreement that we shall neither prepare nor accept a different or
a new confession of our faith. Rather, we pledge ourselves again to those public
and well-known symbols or common confessions which have at all times and in
all places been accepted in all the churches of the Augsburg Confession" (FC
SD, Rule and Norm, 2). And they dare to maintain: "All doctrines should conform
to the standards [the Lutheran Confessions] set forth above. Whatever is contrary
to them should be rejected and condemned as opposed to the unanimous declaration
of our faith" (FC Ep, Rule and Norm, 6). Do such statements reveal pride, cocksureness,
narrowness? Not at all! But Pauline, Spirit-led confidence and optimism.
If only we could recapture
this spirit today! Openness is an in-word today. And a "wholesome latitude"
in doctrine is considered by many Lutherans to be a positive blessing to the
church. Not many years ago a Lutheran synod actually stated (but later modified,
thank goodness): "We are firmly convinced that it is neither necessary nor possible
to agree in all non-fundamental doctrines." But where do the Scriptures or our
Confessions say such a thing? Where are we ever told that we Christians need
not agree on what Scripture affirms? Yes, let us be open to people's desires
and needs, to their diversity of gifts and opinions. But not to error. Let us
rather give heed to Paul's words and speak the same thing and be perfectly joined
together in the same mind and judgment. Let us face up to doctrinal differences
wherever they arise and impinge upon our unity. And let us seek and treasure
the doctrinal unanimity of which our Confessions speak. Then we may call ourselves
Lutherans.
From:
Getting into The
Theology of Concord by Robert D. Preus
(St. Louis: Concordia
Publishing House, 1977), pgs.7-10.
To order a copy of
this book call 800-325-3040
|