The Apology [Defense] of the Augsburg Confession
Article XI: Of Confession.
58] The Eleventh Article, Of Retaining Absolution in the Church,
is approved. But they add a correction in reference to confession, namely,
that the regulation headed, Omnis Utriusque, be observed, and that
both annual confession be made, and, although all sins cannot be enumerated,
nevertheless diligence be employed in order that they be recollected, and
those which can be recalled, be recounted. Concerning this entire article,
we will speak at greater length after a while, when we will explain our
entire opinion concerning repentance.
59] It is well known that
we have so elucidated and extolled [that we have preached, written, and
taught in a, manner so Christian, correct, and pure] the benefit of absolution
and the power of the keys that many distressed consciences have derived
consolation from our doctrine; after they heard that it is the command
of God, nay, rather the very voice of the Gospel, that we should believe
the absolution, and regard it as certain that the remission of sins is
freely granted us for Christ's sake; and that we should believe that by
this faith we are truly reconciled to God [as though we heard a voice from
heaven]. This belief has encouraged many godly minds, and, in the beginning,
brought Luther the highest commendation from all good men, since it shows
consciences sure and firm consolation; because previously the entire power
of absolution [entire necessary doctrine of repentance] had been kept suppressed
by doctrines concerning works, since the sophists and monks taught nothing
of faith and free remission [but pointed men to their own works, from which
nothing but despair enters alarmed consciences].
60] But with respect to the time, certainly most men in
our churches use the Sacraments, absolution and the Lord's Supper, frequently
in a year. And those who teach of the worth and fruits of the Sacraments
speak in such a manner as to invite the people to use the Sacraments frequently.
For concerning this subject there are many things extant written by our
theologians in such a manner that the adversaries, if they are good men,
will undoubtedly approve and 61] praise them. Excommunication is
also pronounced against the openly wicked [those who live in manifest vices,
fornication, adultery, etc.] and the despisers of the Sacraments. These
things are thus done both according to the Gospel and according to 62]
the old canons. But a fixed time is not prescribed, because all are not
ready in like manner at the same time. Yea, if all are to come at the same
time, they cannot be heard and instructed in order [so diligently]. And
the old canons and Fathers do not appoint a fixed time. The canon speaks
only thus: If any enter the Church and be found never to commune, let
them be admonished that, if they do not commune, they come to repentance.
If they commune [if they wish to be regarded as Christians],
let them not be expelled; if they fail to do so, let them be excommunicated.
Christ [Paul] says, 1 Cor. 11, 29, that those who eat unworthily eat judgment
to themselves. The pastors, accordingly, do not compel those who are not
qualified to use the Sacraments.
63] Concerning the enumeration of sins in confession,
men are taught in such a way as not to ensnare their consciences. Although
it is of advantage to accustom inexperienced men to enumerate some things
[which worry them], in order that they may be the more readily taught,
yet we are now discussing what is necessary according to divine Law. Therefore,
the adversaries ought not to cite for us the regulation Omnis Utriusque,
which is not unknown to us, but they ought to show from the divine Law
that an enumeration of sins is necessary for obtaining their remission.
64]
The entire Church, throughout all Europe, knows what sort of snares this
point of the regulation, which commands that all sins be confessed, has
cast upon consciences. Neither has the text by itself as much disadvantage
as was afterwards added by the Summists, who collect the circumstances
of the sins. What labyrinths were there! How great a torture for the best
minds! For the licentious and profane were in no way moved by these instruments
of terror. 65] Afterwards, what tragedies [what jealousy and hatred]
did the questions concerning one's own priest excite among the pastors
and brethren [monks of various orders], who then were by no means brethren
when they were warring concerning jurisdiction of confessions! [For all
brotherliness, all friendship, ceased, when the question was concerning
authority and confessor's fees.] We, therefore, believe that, according
to divine Law, the enumeration of sins is not necessary. This also is pleasing
to Panormitanus and very many other learned jurisconsults. Nor do we wish
to impose necessity upon the consciences of our people by the regulation
Omnis
Utriusque, of which we judge, just as of other human traditions, that
they are not acts of worship necessary for justification. And this regulation
commands an impossible matter, that we should confess all sins. It is evident,
however, that most sins we neither remember nor understand [nor do we indeed
even see the greatest sins], according to Ps. 19, 13:
Who can understand
his errors?
66] If the pastors are good men, they will know how far it is
of advantage to examine [the young and otherwise] inexperienced persons;
but we do not wish to sanction the torture [the tyranny of consciences]
of the Summists, which notwithstanding would have been less intolerable
if they had added one word concerning faith, which comforts and encourages
consciences. Now, concerning this faith, which obtains the remission of
sins, there is not a syllable in so great a mass of regulations, glosses,
summaries, books of confession. Christ is nowhere read there. [Nobody will
there read a word by which he could learn to know Christ, or what Christ
is.] Only the lists of sins are read [to the end of gathering and accumulating
sins; and this would be of some value if they understood those sins which
God regards as such]. And the greater part is occupied with sins against
human traditions,
67] and this is most vain. This doctrine has forced
to despair many, godly minds, which were not able to find rest, because
they believed that by divine Law an enumeration was necessary, and yet
they experienced that it was impossible. But other faults of no less moment
inhere in the doctrine of the adversaries concerning repentance, which
we will now recount.
|